Assessing a vulnerability in conjunction with the threat, and then determining the impact this would have on an operation if the vulnerability is exploited determines the level of risk.

Assessing a vulnerability in conjunction with the threat, and then determining the impact this would have on an operation if the vulnerability is exploited determines the level of risk.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Cannot be determined
• D. Not applicable

Answer: (A)

Assessing risk in security terms means looking at how a vulnerability could be exploited by a threat and what impact that exploitation would have on operations. You evaluate the likelihood that a threat could exploit a vulnerability, then determine the consequence or impact if that exploitation occurs. The risk level emerges from combining how likely the event is with how severe the impact would be. So, when you connect vulnerability, threat, and the resulting operational impact, you’re outlining the process used to gauge risk. For example, a highly exploitable flaw paired with a credible threat that could disrupt critical services would yield a high risk. If either the threat is unlikely or the impact is minimal, the risk would be lower. This makes the statement true.

Assessing risk in security terms means looking at how a vulnerability could be exploited by a threat and what impact that exploitation would have on operations. You evaluate the likelihood that a threat could exploit a vulnerability, then determine the consequence or impact if that exploitation occurs. The risk level emerges from combining how likely the event is with how severe the impact would be. So, when you connect vulnerability, threat, and the resulting operational impact, you’re outlining the process used to gauge risk. For example, a highly exploitable flaw paired with a credible threat that could disrupt critical services would yield a high risk. If either the threat is unlikely or the impact is minimal, the risk would be lower. This makes the statement true.